Over 58383
politifake

Change Politics


what changed? -


TAGS: change
Rating: 4.97/5

More politifakes by JGalt

RonaldReagan - February 14, 2014, 1:36 pm
Ask my grand child. My father would never let me listen to hip hop or what passes for music these days.
JGalt - January 19, 2014, 12:34 am
drug babies, ritalin and meds for ADHD... no- lets believe Jenny McCarthy- its immunization sh**s! yeah that's it.
Curlyrocks - January 19, 2014, 12:25 am
Drugs, there have always been loser parents who don't watch their kid but now they're on freaky drugs.


POLITICIANS ARE LIKE DIAPERS - They need to be changed and often for the same reason


TAGS: make a change
Rating: 4.71/5

More politifakes by OTC



TWO WINGS OF THE SAME BIRD - Argue all you want the flight plan does not change.


TAGS: change
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by CROM

terroraustralis - September 30, 2012, 10:47 pm
and unless both wings work together, the bird very quickly hits the pavement.


Extra Credit Multiple Choice Question -




OBAMA 2012 - The preferred choice of lemmings.




I NEED ABOUT TREE FIDDY - GOD DAMN IT, LOCHNESS MONSTA! I AIN'T GIVIN' Y'NO TREE FIDDY!




JUST SAY NO! - TO THE O, IN 2012




Obama Blames Global Warming For ISIS & Boko Haram -




OBAMA - Hope and Change


TAGS: obama hope and change
Rating: 3.67/5

More politifakes by Jarhead

americamessedup - November 23, 2014, 12:50 am
this is the first pro obama meme i have seen


Arguing with climate change skeptics -


TAGS: climate change deniers pigeon
Rating: 3.96/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Pikeman - November 4, 2015, 10:10 am
What are you going to believe computer models that have failed to predict reality or or your own senses.
fauxnews - February 7, 2015, 5:05 pm
You know....you're a real pain in the a**. :)
Curlyrocks - February 6, 2015, 8:15 pm
The sun in their diagram is in fact much smaller than the sun in reality, and appears to be giving off much less solar radiation than it actually does.


Bill Nye the Socialist Clown -




CHANGE - From bad to worse!


TAGS: change
Rating: 4.47/5

More politifakes by CROM



hope and change -




Warmist Insanity: Climate Change Is Causing Child Marriage -




OBAMA'S CAMPAIGN - More Hope and Change?




TIME FOR CHANGE - just sayin


TAGS: change
Rating: 4.5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

Capt. Morgan - September 27, 2012, 4:25 pm
Ambassador dragged off to be tortured and murdered? Just a bump in the road! The MSM will never report it.


Global Warming Is A Hoax -




CHANGE - that's all you'll have left once he gets through with you




WASTING AWAY IN OBAMAVILLE - Looking for our lost glimmer of hope..




" 4TH OF JULY 2011 " - Dependent on : Junk Food Golf Teleprompter




Got 99 problems -




1100 BC -




MUCH NEEDED R & R FROM CHANGE - It is time to Recover from the Change.. It is time for TRUE Leadership! Vote Romney/Ryan on 11-6-2012




SPARE CHANGE -




THE CHANGE WE NEED - and soon!




Consensus, Models & Predictions vs. REALITY -


TAGS: global warming myth hoax climate change scam green energy farce consensus models predictions reality ipcc al gore greenies alarmists warmists
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 4, 2015, 12:39 pm
Here's a possible explaination, http://www.cato.org/blog/you-ought-have-look-climate-sensitivity-environmental-worries-are-trending-downward


Eco-Pope Francis -




LIBERAL DAILY AFFIRMATION XVI -




TECHNICALLY - the destruction of a nation is change...




MAKES ME WANT TO OPEN A BUMPER STICKER SHOP . . . - . . . but with Obama letting the Bush tax cuts expire, I'd be bankrupt.




CHANGE - Into a truck




CHANGE - Is also what Germany was looking for in 1932


TAGS: change
Rating: 3.41/5

More politifakes by DLM4



Idiot In Chief Obama -




AL GORE- CLIMATE CHANGE - If it weren't for Al Gore, I would not have known that climate changes!




climate change -




Man-made global warming fraud -




DEMOCRATS NEVER CHANGE -


TAGS: democrats never change
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

foxrecon19d - October 2, 2013, 12:00 pm
Nope Renzahead the Epic Fail. Canada is real. Now go impress everyone in your kindergarten class by finding it on a map. I'll give you a clue. It is north of the country that Barack Obama has taught you to hate.
Renza - October 1, 2013, 11:45 pm
I love how you put quotes around 'Canadian' as though it's something that was made up.
foxrecon19d - October 1, 2013, 12:28 pm
Oh, yeah, my bad. You're "Canadian". I love how all the admitted Obama-worshippers on this site are "Canadian..."
crankyhead - September 30, 2013, 10:51 pm
Fox, I thought you said you were an American soldier? I'm Canadian. Your tax dollars don't pay for a thing up here bud. Mine do.
foxrecon19d - September 30, 2013, 3:01 pm
The road that leads to your mommys basement where you live, you didnt build that. I built that. My tax money built that. Try again
crankyhead - September 30, 2013, 12:43 pm
No fox, I don't collect a wage from the tax payer. Try again.
foxrecon19d - September 30, 2013, 10:59 am
crankyhead, somebody ALWAYS pays. When the Democrats say "free" they mean pass the cost on to others. When they say, the richest Americans, they mean the middle class. And when they say dependent on government for survival, they mean YOU
crankyhead - September 29, 2013, 9:53 pm
Not having to pay out of pocket when you arrive at the E.R.
foxrecon19d - September 29, 2013, 3:29 pm
Hey crankyhead the Canadifake, here is another quest for you. Tell us what is "free" about free access to medical care, especially if you are being forced by the government to pay for it. Ready... GO!!
crankyhead - September 29, 2013, 1:39 pm
Not.
crankyhead - September 29, 2013, 1:39 pm
Right. Because when you think about it logically, and critically, free access to medical care really is the same thing as slavery.


Liberal Science Deniers -




CHANGE -




"TOGETHER WE THRIVE" - Behold The "Change" Obama Brought to the United States of America!




CHANGE - Is not always a good thing.




CLIMATE ALARMIST HYPOCRITES - 140 private jets, 1,200 limos and 40K tons of CO2. In one week these clowns will create a carbon footprint equal to the annual footprint of 30 small countries.




WHEN OBAMA SUCKS OUT LOUD - Immediately Trash Palin and Attempt to Divert Attention




DEMOCRATS - Corrupt and thin-skinned




CHANGED? - Obama changed from bad to worse




SOCIALIST POLICIES - "Money is not the only answer, but it makes a difference." --Barack Obama Mr. President, can we please see one of your other answers now?




TERRORISTS - Pretty much interchangeable, wherever they live.




CHANGE FOR 2012 - Because underdogs don't deserve to be in the Oval Office.


TAGS: whitehouse ovaloffice change new
Rating: 0/5

More politifakes by Candyapplesam

KALKAM - October 24, 2012, 1:37 pm
That's Obama's lunch...


Democrats -


TAGS: no change
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - October 5, 2014, 5:25 pm
The quotes I cited told me about his ovvious bigotry and that speaks volumes about his character.
Cyberhagen - October 4, 2014, 12:38 pm
Pretty sure you don't have the full story: http://theblacksphere.net/2013/07/civil-wrongs-lyndon-b-johnson/
Zeitguy - October 4, 2014, 12:32 am
Pretty sure
Zeitguy - October 4, 2014, 12:31 am
Yes, a great example of the great ruse of politics. " the common man is easy fodder for the ideals of those lacking in morals and superfluous in rhetoric condemning those perceived without.
JGalt - October 2, 2014, 6:17 am
pretty sure this is accurate- same as what my folks told me about the 50's and 60's: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/some-of-the-lost-history-in-the-civil-rights-movement
JGalt - October 2, 2014, 6:15 am
pretty sure Al Gore's dad in the Senate led the opposition to civil rights legislation. JFK today would be called an extreme conservative by progressive standards.
Zeitguy - October 2, 2014, 1:48 am
Pretty sure the JFK and LBJ administrations led the civil rights movement during the 60's. Granted, probably not for altruistic intentions but non the less.?
terroraustralis - September 29, 2014, 4:54 am
5L, brilliant!


Thank You, Dear Leader -




PROVERBS 24:21 - ...and meddle not with them that are given to change




Climate Change = Agenda 21 & Globalization -




Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -


TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)


CO2 rising while temperatures flatten -


TAGS: climate change is natural
Rating: 4.42/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - April 18, 2015, 5:16 pm
Must be talking about the Westboro Baptists
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 3:41 pm
PWNed lol
DebtToAmerica - April 18, 2015, 3:35 pm
"claims god is unknowable. claims to know god hates liberals."
fauxnews - April 17, 2015, 5:22 pm
TITLE TRANSLATION(in OTC speak):"Atmospheric science and climatology is a complex CONCEPT I don't fully understand. But somehow I fully understand that a man is responsible for his changing contradictory stances even if I don't think it applies to me."X-D


immutable truth -




PRESIDENT OBAMA - "I can remember way back when a liberal was generous with his own money" --Will Rogers




It's a cycle stupid -


TAGS: climate change is normal
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - February 4, 2015, 5:28 pm
you're the one believing what cranky said i believe about CO2. I've made posters contradicting that
fauxnews - February 3, 2015, 6:51 pm
proper syntax*RIDING-THE-FENCE
fauxnews - February 3, 2015, 6:50 pm
False information?how about NO information.When you actually provide something tangible,I'll let ya know.In the meanwhile,you're content trying to pass off'riding-the-fence'as a actual argument so that way no one can question you.How childish can you get?
OTC - February 2, 2015, 6:04 pm
So you admit you weren't paying attention and that your rhetoric has faux believing false information
crankyhead - February 1, 2015, 2:10 pm
OK then OTC, now's your chance to explain yourself. Provide the 'true info', or whatever you want to call it.
OTC - February 1, 2015, 7:53 am
Faux, you're believing what cranky said I believe, not what I believe. You see how easy it is to believe false info?
fauxnews - February 1, 2015, 2:44 am
lol...So, OTC, you are saying that natural CO2 is different than man-made CO2? OTC...let me introduce you to my good friend, the 'periodic table.' ROFLCOPTER
crankyhead - January 31, 2015, 3:29 pm
…been able to get him to explain why.
crankyhead - January 31, 2015, 3:29 pm
Moreover, OTC doesn't even deny CO2's involvement as one of the main causes of climate change. What he does deny, however, is that the CO2 the is produced by industry (coal, fossil fuels, etc…) is the same stuff produced by nature. And I've never...
OTC - January 28, 2015, 8:54 pm
Zeit, stop confusing facts with opinions
OTC - January 28, 2015, 8:53 pm
Sure faux, I've even been to (according to Al Sharpton) Iowa Canada
OTC - January 28, 2015, 8:51 pm
Well, since you're gonna answer for Zeit I tell you you're both wrong, I don't deny climate change
fauxnews - January 28, 2015, 3:13 pm
Now that's a good boy.
OTC - January 28, 2015, 2:12 pm
Why would I insult Canada? It's a beautiful country
fauxnews - January 28, 2015, 1:41 pm
lol
fauxnews - January 28, 2015, 1:40 pm
So now comes "clown" and "skippy" and the other nervous tics when you get a little unraveled..lol..You're falling apart at the seams, man! Get a grip. P.S. You forgot to insult Canada X-D
fauxnews - January 28, 2015, 1:35 pm
Uh, climatology. duh..lol..And the 97% of climatologists/scientists that disagree with you.Plus, now, apparently, all the Republicans in the Senate who've said, and I quote, global warming is NOT "a hoax." Is that"specific"enough for ya?If so,ACES! X-D
OTC - January 28, 2015, 1:09 pm
Your sentence sounds like you're talking about the science of carbon taxation
OTC - January 28, 2015, 1:04 pm
Deny what science? be specific
Zeitguy - January 28, 2015, 11:55 am
Debating the issue of carbon taxation is one thing, but to deny the science is quite another.
OTC - January 28, 2015, 9:49 am
Great, another clown who thinks he knows me. news flash skippy, if a republican had made it and if republicans were pushing tax and control because if man-made global warming the poster would have 'republicans'
OTC - January 28, 2015, 9:45 am
So tell, what is it I'm denying?
DebtToAmerica - January 28, 2015, 12:25 am
he doesnt believe in scientists, he thinks they're just liberals wearing labcoats. and that dog that barks all night? its a liberal too. and the terrorists? they're definetly liberals. and that obama guy is the biggest liberal of them all!
DebtToAmerica - January 28, 2015, 12:21 am
you'd be cupping the balls and s******ing the bull**** if it was a republican who had made "an inconvinient truth". and i think its hilarious.
OTC - January 27, 2015, 9:23 pm
Scientific community? I didn't know Al Gore and Sheldon Whitehouse were scientists
Zeitguy - January 27, 2015, 7:45 pm
OTC, really? Liberals? Come on man. Stop with the blind labeling to establish your own shortsighted validation. In this case call them the scientific community and yourself the faith driven denier. It's OK, the first step is the hardest.
OTC - January 27, 2015, 2:05 pm
The aim of liberals is to attack when always questioned
Bandit5906 - January 27, 2015, 12:26 pm
The aim of science is to always question!
Zeitguy - January 27, 2015, 7:49 am
Change "liberals" to scientists and stop confusing weather with climate.


2012 - Are y'all happy with that Hopey Changey BS yet?




$12.3T IN DEBT - After tripling our debt, Obama wants to raise the debt limit another $1.9T! Is there any doubt that these radicals are intentionally destroying our economy? -Source: www.usdebtclock.org




LIBERAL TRUTH #2 - Responsibility and Accountability are for suckers! Always blame the guys on the other side of the aisle.




GLOBAL WARMING PROTESTERS - What? The Earth's been cooling for 10 years? And there's a blizzard out there? And the Climate Change scientists have been cooking the books? We're still marching! I already got the permits!




T. E. A. - TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY!




Global Warming Denial -


TAGS: climate change denial snow man
Rating: 3.22/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Zeitguy - July 19, 2014, 6:27 pm
That's a little bit funny.


You can have your own set of opinions... -




How Republicans View Scientific Consensus -


TAGS: climate change denier darth vader
Rating: 2.45/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - April 5, 2015, 3:03 am
Which part the Star Wars reference, the original sin reference and other religious references, or that he is attacking people on MMGW beliefs?
RonaldReagan - April 5, 2015, 2:59 am
Don't get it
freasy - March 10, 2015, 1:01 pm
I am against the Patriot Act, and many other things the government does.
DebtToAmerica - March 10, 2015, 12:59 am
what do they have to gain by tricking people into thinking that MMCC is real? if government intervention is their goal, why arent you campaigning against the patriot act and other anti-terror laws that violate the constitution?
OTC - March 9, 2015, 12:33 am
Yes, climate change is. real. It's man-made climate change that's a hoax


OBAMA MEDIA GROUP CALLS IT A NAILBITER - Yet Scott Walker wins by 6 points. When a liberal wins by 6 points its a landslide victory, and a clear mandate from the people!




Loony Liberals -




VOTING DAY CHANGE ALERT!! - ....And to my supporters: Your voting day has been changed to Wednesday, November 7th, 2012..




" CHANGED BECAUSE WE CAN'T WAIT " - In the past 50 years, 10 U.S. Presidents have made annual budget requests to Congress




" CHANGE " - Food stamp use rises to record 45.8 million under Obama's watch.




SCAMPAIGN 2012 - Are you going to be mesmerized by the lies or will you listen to the voice of reason.




NASA – CO2 is a Global Coolant -




CHANGE -




GEORGE WASHINGTON "BEHOLD WHAT HAS BECOME OF THE WHITE HOUSE" - Biggest looser: THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!




Obama pushes climate change hoax agenda -


TAGS: climate change is normal
Rating: 4.6/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - July 7, 2013, 6:01 pm
Comments like- " I know for a fact though, than human beings are pumping trillions of tonnes of the stuff into the atmosphere annually by burning fossil fuels." Comment #54878
OTC - July 7, 2013, 5:49 pm
The conclusion can be made by your comments as to what you believe
StoneTools - July 7, 2013, 3:09 pm
Please explain how CO2 was the cause of global cooling in the seventies and global warming in the 2000s
crankyhead - July 7, 2013, 12:02 pm
...Please explain to us how it's possible that naturally occuring CO2 can warm up the atmosphere, but man made CO2 doesn't? Please explain to us how you keep these two obviously conflicting thoughts in your head at the same time, and believe both.
crankyhead - July 7, 2013, 12:00 pm
How is it that OTC continues to pretend to tell me what I believe, instead of taking the time to try and understand what I believe? I NEVER said that the production of CO2 was the exclusive domain of man. You dimwit. What I said, OTC, was this...
JGalt - July 6, 2013, 12:00 am
in increasing CO2 from a measly 280 ppm to 400 ppm???? WTF Logic Fail. Arguments and fancy discussions about about the greenhouse effect are not going to overcome physical chemistry and thermal conductivity experiments....of a gas at 400 ppm vs 80% N2
JGalt - July 5, 2013, 11:52 pm
In the 70's CO2 rose and the scientists were worried about global cooling and the next ice age. If the thermal conductivity of Nitrogen is nearly twice that of C02, how do liberals justify that the 80% of Nitrogen atmosphere is overcome by global warming
OTC - July 4, 2013, 6:47 pm
For something we have no control over
OTC - July 4, 2013, 6:47 pm
How is it liberals think CO2 only comes from man and only CO2 is causing global warming? Solar activity has nothing at all to with it, nature it self has nothing to do with it, only man. Idiots, global warming is nothing more than a means to tax people
crankyhead - July 4, 2013, 3:19 pm
...begin to even pretend to yourself, that billions of tonnes of man made CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere isn't toying with that cycle? Honestly, please explain to me, how it is you can believe two opposite things at the same time.
crankyhead - July 4, 2013, 3:17 pm
You too OTC. Thanks for telling me what I believe. You guys must be debate team champs or something. Let me ask you something OTC, if you're willing to concede that CO2 levels in the atmosphere are part of the 'warming/cooling' cycle, how can you...
OTC - July 3, 2013, 5:07 pm
One more time, I don't disagree the earth goes through cycles of heating and cooling, I do disagree that man is the cause of the current warming and since that is what you believe, I have to disagree with you.
KaBoom - July 1, 2013, 7:32 pm
..levels were much higher than they are now.The sun's output and the Earth's position correlate to temp changes better than any CO2 graph does.Temps trend up AND down with the same CO2 levels.If Gore was right, that wouldn't be true.
KaBoom - July 1, 2013, 7:28 pm
CO2 does have a greenhouse effect and all things being equal will increase temps.However, the temp is NOT completely dependent and there is no such thing as a "runaway greenhouse effect." There have been numerous ice ages that have happened AFTER CO2..
crankyhead - July 1, 2013, 1:58 pm
Good of you to not disagree with me, OTC. I must be finally getting through to you.
OTC - June 29, 2013, 8:54 pm
crankyhead - May 3, 2013, 5:47 pm, #54770 Increased levels of CO2, is what I said, OTC. You can agree or refute, I'll wait.
OTC - June 29, 2013, 8:43 pm
"who admitted that a rise in CO2 caused the earth to warm up"- cranky. Comment #54770
crankyhead - June 29, 2013, 4:15 pm
That's called cognitive dissonance folks. It's a hallmark of right wing ideology.
crankyhead - June 29, 2013, 4:14 pm
Let's see... who was it that I was talking to, who admitted that a rise in CO2 caused the earth to warm up enough to end an ice age, but somehow wants to not believe that a rise in CO2 is warming up the planet?
crankyhead - June 29, 2013, 4:12 pm
CO2 is, in fact, a greenhouse gas, you idiot.
OTC - June 29, 2013, 1:52 pm
ST, according to that article, it seems liberals think the news media are scientists. 'A rise in CO2 while temperatures are in a lull' , lets see, who was it that argued with me that a rise in CO2 is causing the rise in temperatures?
StoneTools - June 28, 2013, 3:04 pm
http://mrc.org/bias-numbers/networks-do-92-climate-change-stories-fail-mention-lull-warming-all-92-times
OTC - June 28, 2013, 1:57 pm
If we observe it is raining, should we sound the alarm for global flooding?
OTC - June 27, 2013, 12:16 pm
Renza, before stating your opinion, did you research that to see if the opinion was derived from research or did you merely state your opinion without any research?
StoneTools - June 27, 2013, 8:54 am
There's also a difference between stating an opinion and using bogus results from "research" to "prove" your results.
Renza - June 27, 2013, 8:14 am
There's also a difference between stating an opinion and doing research on the topic before stating an opinion.
StoneTools - June 27, 2013, 1:11 am
There's also a difference between saying "there's a tornado coming" and saying "Man caused that tornado to exist"
terroraustralis - June 27, 2013, 12:36 am
they arent predicting climate change, they're observing it. theres a big difference between saying theres a tornado coming, and saying "hey, look over there! a tornado!"


HOPE AND CHANGE - The change is worse




HOPE AND CHANGE - This is where you spend the change..


TAGS: hope change condoms obama fluke
Rating: 4.54/5

More politifakes by GrouchoMarxist

GrouchoMarxist - September 27, 2012, 12:33 am
Only you can prevent liberals


OBAMA VOTERS- IS THIS YOU? -




OBAMALAISE - Like Jimmy Carter Malaise, but only 10 times worse.




TESTIMONIAL - For years I was cheating on my taxes but I got caught, so I called BHO Tax Relief. Not only didn't I pay penalties or interest, but now I run the IRS. Thanks, Barack!




STARVATION IN THE UKRAINE - No doubt they were promised Hope and Change too.




FOOD STAMP GRAPH - Obamanomics in their natural habitat




SILVER LINING - I just found mine!




ON THE ROAD AGAIN - Congressman Weiner takes Hope & Change on the road




IMBECILES - Confusing a Tina Fey joke with a Sarah Palin quote




TRACK RECORD - - A past performance often taken as an indicator of likely future performance. You can keep the "change"




"CHANGE" HAS FAILED BEFORE - Cuba, Germany, Zimbabwe, Russia, Venezuela.... etc


TAGS: change
Rating: 3.5/5

More politifakes by JGalt



BARACK OBLAME-A - because nothing says incompetency more than blaming everyone else, or blaming George Bush every chance you get. Sack up dude and drain the swamp




PREVARICATOR - "...no pork in the Stimulus Bill" --Barack Obama (if you don't count dog parks, frisbee golf course, STD testing, NASA satellite, ATV trails, doorbells, digital converters, etc...)




AL GORE - Somehow, he managed to succeed in making conservative Republicans care about science to a certain......degree.




It's not climate change it's not climate change it's not climate change it's not climate change ... -




IGNORING A PROBLEM DOESN'T MAKE IT GO AWAY -




Finally: Hope & Change! -




HERMAN CAIN SUGGESTS - That "Occupy Wall Street" protestors should be occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. I think he's clearly nailed this one




HOPE 'N CHANGE - Howz that Hopey-Changey thing working for those of you blinded by Obama's Kool Aid?




Climate Crusader DiCaprio -




OBAMA'S BUDGET MULLIGANS - The Republican Congress passed a budget April 15. The Do-nothing Democratic Senate has not passed a budget and Obama would rather wait for a Rhambo crisis to take ram it through.. End the error in 2012.




Climate Change Is The Global Crisis Key To Unlock The New World Order -


TAGS: climate change global crisis key unlock the new world order gordon brown quote global warming hoax greenies warmists alarmists hysterians eco fascism socialism nwo ipcc
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

freasy - May 5, 2015, 12:39 pm
Bottom line, the data was fudged. Lies Lies and d***ed lies.


" U.S. POSTAL SERVICE : 1775 - 2011 " - U.S. Postal Service to go bankrupt by September !




CHANGE - you can count on!




PREV PAGENEXT PAGE